Residents question Utah County's enforcement of seasonal occupancy and water rights issues

During the Utah County Commission meeting on September 22, 2021, residents raised pressing concerns regarding water rights and occupancy regulations in Upper Whittemore and Hobble Creek Canyon. The discussions highlighted the ongoing challenges faced by homeowners in these areas, particularly in light of recent drought conditions and regulatory complexities.

One resident, Dionne Baron, inquired about the county's enforcement of seasonal occupancy limits in Upper Whittemore, which stipulate that properties can only be occupied for 180 days annually. Baron expressed concern for a retiree who has invested all their savings into a home in the area, emphasizing that for some, these homes are not vacation properties but their primary residences. She requested clarity on how the county plans to enforce these regulations, particularly as they relate to individuals who may be living in their homes year-round.

Another resident, Janice Reeb, shared her family's struggles with water rights, noting that their access has been significantly reduced due to drought and regulatory changes. Reeb highlighted the historical context of their water shares, which date back to 1851, and expressed frustration over the inability to use agricultural equipment for irrigation. She pointed out the broader implications of water scarcity, including its impact on health and safety in the community, particularly in light of past flooding and fire risks.

The meeting also addressed the complexities surrounding a proposed zoning amendment that could allow for commercial developments in sensitive environmental areas. Reeb voiced her concerns about the potential consequences of such developments on local water resources and wildlife habitats, urging the commission to consider the long-term environmental impacts.

As discussions progressed, the issue of building permits for homes in the canyon came to the forefront. A homeowner expressed frustration over delays in obtaining necessary permits due to pending ordinances related to water rights. The county attorney clarified that state law prohibits issuing permits while an ordinance is pending, but assured that a resolution would be reached within the next month, either by passing the ordinance or allowing the permit to be issued due to the expiration of the 180-day review period.

The meeting underscored the critical intersection of land use, water rights, and community safety in Utah County. As residents navigate these challenges, the commission's forthcoming decisions will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of housing and environmental stewardship in the region. The urgency of these discussions reflects broader concerns about resource management and the need for clear communication between county officials and residents.