The San Francisco Abatement Appeals Board convened on July 4, 2025, to address a request for rehearing concerning a property at 5 Lunado. The meeting focused on whether to grant an extension for the abatement process due to delays in construction.
During the session, appellant Henry Kanelowitz argued for a 90-day extension, citing difficulties in obtaining materials and labor as reasons for the delay. He clarified that the request was not to remove the abatement but to allow more time for the necessary work to be completed. Kanelowitz emphasized that the misunderstanding from the previous hearing led to the current request for a rehearing.
The board members discussed the criteria for granting a rehearing, which requires new evidence or a demonstration of legal error. After deliberation, the chair noted that no new evidence had been presented to justify a rehearing. A motion was made to deny the request, which was seconded and subsequently voted on.
The board unanimously decided to deny the request for rehearing, concluding that the appellant had not met the necessary criteria. This decision underscores the board's commitment to adhering to established procedures and ensuring that appeals are based on substantial grounds. The outcome of this meeting highlights the challenges property owners face in navigating the abatement process amid ongoing construction delays.