SFMTA revokes George Horrible's taxi medallion due to licensing issues

The San Francisco City Council convened on July 4, 2025, to address several appeals concerning taxi medallion revocations, focusing primarily on the case of George Horrible, who contested the revocation of his taxi medallion number 1303. The meeting began with a motion that passed unanimously, granting an appeal related to a different matter before moving on to Horrible's case.

Horrible's appeal stems from a decision made by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) on July 9, 2021, which revoked his medallion due to his lack of a current California driver's license and an "A" card, which are required for medallion holders under the transportation code. The procedural history of this case is extensive, having been heard multiple times since September 2021, with the most recent hearing occurring on May 11, 2022. At that time, the board had voted to continue the matter, anticipating potential changes in legislation or policy that could affect the medallion's value.

During the meeting, Philip Grama, the enforcement legal affairs manager, reiterated the SFMTA's position, emphasizing the necessity of maintaining an active "A" card for full-time drivers. He requested that the board uphold the decision to revoke Horrible's medallion.

Horrible, who is 75 years old and has faced significant health challenges, addressed the board directly, appealing for compassion and understanding. He expressed concern that the revocation would severely impact his financial security and dignity, as he relies on a small Social Security check for his living expenses. He urged the commissioners to consider the hardships faced by elderly and disabled medallion holders like himself.

The discussion also included questions from Commissioner Trezvina regarding the procedural aspects of the reconsideration process that led to the current decision. The city attorney's office was questioned about the communication that prompted the reconsideration, which was described as an email rather than a formal hearing.

Public comments followed, with speakers discussing the broader implications of taxi medallion policies and the historical context of medallion types. The meeting highlighted ongoing tensions between traditional taxi services and rideshare companies, with some advocating for pilot programs to enhance the competitiveness of taxi services.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the complexities surrounding taxi medallion regulations in San Francisco, particularly as they relate to aging and disabled drivers. The board's decision on Horrible's appeal remains pending, with significant implications for his livelihood and the broader taxi industry.