Residents voice concerns over proposed 18-unit development on steep California slope

In a tense meeting at San Francisco City Hall, residents voiced their deep concerns over a proposed construction project on a steep hillside, fearing it could jeopardize their safety and quality of life. The project, which aims to build multiple units on a site previously used as a quarry, has sparked significant opposition from neighboring homeowners who worry about potential landslides, noise, and loss of privacy.

Laura Levine and Richard Marcheson, residents of 300 Greystone Terrace, were among the first to express their apprehensions. They highlighted the potential for construction noise to disrupt their work-from-home routines and the risk of losing tenants due to the disturbances. Their proposed solution? Compensation for any loss of income resulting from the construction.

Dr. Maxine Ovsyannikov, living nearby, raised alarms about the steep slope's susceptibility to seismic-induced landslides, urging for additional geotechnical studies to assess the risks. Similarly, Dr. Rachel Abrams, another concerned neighbor, emphasized the need for careful review due to the site's unstable soil conditions and the potential impact on local wildlife.

The planning department acknowledged the residents' concerns but clarified that their jurisdiction primarily covers land use and design compliance, not geotechnical safety. They noted that while the project adheres to planning codes, the structural integrity and safety measures fall under the purview of the Department of Building Inspection.

As the meeting progressed, the project’s architect defended the design, asserting that the construction would include measures to stabilize the hillside and mitigate risks. He emphasized that the project would not only comply with safety regulations but also enhance the area by improving drainage and reducing the risk of future landslides.

Despite the architect's reassurances, residents remained skeptical. They argued that the proposed building's scale was out of character with the neighborhood and would overshadow their homes, blocking sunlight and infringing on their privacy. The emotional toll of the potential construction was palpable, with residents expressing fears for their children’s safety and the loss of their tranquil living environment.

As the meeting concluded, city officials encouraged ongoing dialogue between the developers and the concerned residents, emphasizing the importance of addressing safety and environmental issues as the project moves forward. The outcome remains uncertain, but the voices of the community have made it clear: they are not willing to compromise their safety and quality of life without thorough consideration and safeguards in place.