A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Linda Matsumura appeals 515 Third Avenue deck's privacy infringement in local hearing

July 27, 2022 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Linda Matsumura appeals 515 Third Avenue deck's privacy infringement in local hearing
The San Francisco City Council meeting on July 4, 2025, focused on a contentious appeal regarding a newly constructed deck at 515 Third Avenue. The appellant, Linda Matsumura, expressed significant concerns about privacy and safety due to the deck's proximity to her property. Matsumura stated that she discovered the deck had been built while she was away caring for a friend, and she was not given the opportunity to voice her concerns before construction began.

Matsumura highlighted that the deck allows for a direct line of sight into her home, which she described as an invasion of privacy. She argued that the deck does not fit the character of the neighborhood and would substantially decrease her quality of life, especially as a retiree who enjoys her backyard garden. She requested that the board require the property owner to construct a 10-foot high fence and a solid privacy screen to mitigate the intrusiveness of the deck.

In response, the property owner’s representative, Artin Chen, defended the deck's construction, stating that it complies with city codes, including a required 5-foot side setback. Chen argued that the deck's design limits access to only one bedroom, suggesting that privacy concerns were overstated. He also noted that neighboring properties have similar structures, indicating that the deck aligns with the neighborhood's characteristics.

The meeting underscored the ongoing tension between property development and resident privacy in San Francisco, with the board set to deliberate on the appeal and its implications for local zoning and building regulations. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future developments in residential areas, particularly regarding privacy and community standards.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee