Neighbors debate privacy concerns over Valencia Street building expansion plans

The San Francisco City Commission convened on July 4, 2025, to discuss a public request for discretionary review concerning building permit number 20220420.2645. The proposal involves constructing a third-story vertical addition and a two-story horizontal rear addition to an existing two-story residential building located at 1304 Valencia Street. The building, categorized as a non-historic resource built in 1900, currently houses two dwelling units above ground-level commercial space.

The meeting began with a presentation from city staff, who noted that no letters of support or opposition had been received regarding the project. Staff recommended against taking discretionary review, stating that the proposed addition complies with the planning code and urban design guidelines, ensuring reasonable access to light, air, and privacy for neighboring properties.

Seth Andrzejewski, the project requester, expressed concerns on behalf of himself and his neighbor, Nathaniel Klinger, who reside directly south of the proposed construction. They highlighted issues regarding potential impacts on security and privacy due to the proposed mezzanine and third-floor deck, which they argued would allow views directly into their property. They suggested alternatives, including eliminating the mezzanine level and constructing an eight-foot-high security fence.

Andrew Morel, the architect representing the project, defended the proposal, emphasizing that it aligns with the zoning regulations and the need for additional housing in the area. He acknowledged the previous fire at the property and outlined plans for renovation, including expanding existing units and adding a new residential unit. Morel argued that the design incorporates privacy measures, such as a bamboo privacy screen, to mitigate concerns raised by the neighbors.

During the discussion, commissioners sought clarification on the legality of existing structures and the compliance of the proposed additions with city codes. Staff confirmed that the project adheres to the required rear yard dimensions and does not necessitate any variances.

The meeting concluded with a recognition of the challenges posed by the dense urban environment, where privacy concerns are common. The commission will deliberate on the proposal and its implications for the neighborhood in future sessions, with no immediate decisions made during this meeting.