A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Gordy Holterman contests San Francisco tree removal order at 2350 Green Street

July 06, 2022 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Gordy Holterman contests San Francisco tree removal order at 2350 Green Street
The San Francisco City Council convened on July 4, 2025, to address a significant appeal concerning the removal of five street trees located at 2350 Green Street. The appeal was brought forth by Gordy Holterman against the San Francisco Public Works, Bureau of Urban Forestry, following a public works order issued on May 3, 2022, which approved the removal of the trees with conditions for replacement.

Mr. Holterman opened the discussion by expressing concerns about the decision to remove the trees, emphasizing their health and longevity. He noted that the trees, which are approximately 20 to 25 years old, have a typical lifespan of 60 to 75 years and are in excellent condition. Holterman highlighted the lack of community engagement during the initial hearing, attributing low attendance to inadequate notice and inconvenient scheduling.

He referenced a nearly 30-year-old private agreement between the Archdiocese of San Francisco and the neighborhood, which stipulates that the trees should be maintained to full maturity. Holterman argued that the trees are not only healthy but that the community is willing to take responsibility for their care, including watering and pruning, as the school has not adequately maintained them.

Holterman raised questions about the motivations behind the school's request for tree removal, suggesting that it may be linked to recent permits for construction work at the school rather than the trees' health. He expressed concern that the removal would lead to an undesirable view of a parking lot, diminishing the neighborhood's aesthetic.

The meeting continued with questions from council members, including President Swig, indicating that further discussions would follow regarding the implications of the appeal and the conditions surrounding the tree removal order. The council's deliberations on this matter reflect ongoing tensions between urban development and community interests in preserving green spaces.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee