Homeowners propose new plans for 1681 Tenth Avenue following unlawful demolition issues

Homeowners in San Francisco are seeking to resolve a complex situation regarding the rebuilding of their home, which was demolished without proper permits. During a recent city meeting, representatives for the homeowners presented their case, emphasizing their commitment to address the issues surrounding the property at 1681 Tenth Avenue.

The homeowners, a family of four, expressed their distress over the current state of their property, which has remained vacant since the demolition. They highlighted the emotional and practical challenges they face as they navigate the city's building regulations and the planning department's requirements. A conditional use permit application was submitted in December 2024 to initiate the planning process, but complications arose due to discrepancies in the recorded size of the home.

The city’s Department of Building Inspection (DBI) had issued a director's order stating that the previous home was 1,340 square feet, a figure the homeowners contest. They argue that the actual size was 2,701 square feet, as established by a site permit issued in 2020. This discrepancy is critical, as it affects the type of structure they are permitted to rebuild. The homeowners are advocating for the correction of this order to reflect the accurate size, which would allow them to rebuild either a single-family home or a two-unit building, as suggested by the planning department.

DBI officials acknowledged the unfortunate circumstances surrounding the demolition and commended the homeowners for their proactive approach in seeking a resolution. They noted that the code enforcement is strict, and while the homeowners are exploring options to maximize the density of the property, they must also comply with existing regulations.

Public comments during the meeting included concerns from neighboring property owners about the demolition process and the lack of communication regarding the project. One resident recounted their experience of witnessing the demolition and expressed frustration over the disruption it caused.

As discussions continue, the homeowners remain hopeful for a resolution that will allow them to rebuild their home and restore their family's living situation. The city officials are expected to further review the case, with the potential for a revised order that accurately reflects the property's size and allows for construction to proceed. The outcome of this situation could set a precedent for similar cases in the future, highlighting the importance of accurate record-keeping and communication in the building process.