San Francisco Planning Commission asserts attorney client privilege in closed session

In a special closed session hearing on May 23, 2024, the San Francisco Planning Commission convened to discuss matters of legal counsel, emphasizing the importance of maintaining attorney-client privilege. The session began with a roll call, confirming the presence of six commissioners, while Commissioner Koppel was noted as absent.

Public comments were invited, with one speaker, Georgia Shutish, urging the commission to consider transparency regarding the UDU (Underground Development Unit), which she identified as a central issue. She expressed concern about the public's right to be informed, suggesting that discussions should be opened to public scrutiny after the closed session.

Following public comments, the commission unanimously voted to assert attorney-client privilege concerning the matters discussed. This decision was made with a motion from Vice President Moore, which received support from all present commissioners. The session then transitioned into a closed format, with the public asked to leave the chambers.

Upon reconvening, the commission reported that no actions were taken during the closed session. They subsequently voted to not disclose any details from the discussions, again passing the motion unanimously. This decision underscores the commission's commitment to confidentiality in legal matters, while also highlighting ongoing tensions between public transparency and legal protections.

The meeting concluded without any further announcements, leaving the community awaiting future updates on the UDU and other planning issues. The commission's actions reflect a cautious approach to sensitive legal discussions, balancing the need for privacy with public interest.