Neighbors oppose demolition of rent-controlled units at 249 Texas Street

Concerns over a proposed demolition project in San Francisco's Potrero Hill neighborhood dominated a recent city planning commission meeting, as residents rallied against plans to replace a two-unit rent-controlled building with a single-family mansion. Kathleen Block, representing the current tenants, highlighted the long-standing history of affordable housing at 249 Texas Street, arguing that the proposed changes would displace tenants and disrupt the community.

Block asserted that the second unit, which the sponsors claimed had been legally removed, was still viable and had provided rent-controlled housing for years. She emphasized that the new construction would not only fail to increase housing stock but would also tower over neighboring homes, impacting light and privacy for residents. "The planned home does not actually increase housing stock," Block stated, urging the commission to reconsider the height and design of the new structure.

Residents expressed frustration over a lack of communication from the sponsors and the planning department, with many claiming they were not adequately notified about the hearings. "We were excluded from communications on this project," said Layla, a local mother, highlighting the disconnect between the developers and the community.

The meeting also saw testimony from former tenants and advocates who argued that the demolition would violate San Francisco's general plan aimed at preserving affordable housing. Critics pointed out that the sponsors' claims about the necessity of demolition were misleading, with evidence suggesting the existing units could be renovated rather than torn down.

As the commission deliberates, community members are calling for a compromise that would maintain the existing structure and protect the neighborhood's character. "We ask you commissioners to please intervene to ensure an equitable outcome for all," Block concluded, emphasizing the need for the commission to prioritize the voices of long-term residents over the interests of new developers. The outcome of this contentious proposal remains to be seen, as the community continues to advocate for their rights and the preservation of affordable housing in San Francisco.