SFUSD Board debates inequitable funding model for AP classes

The San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) held a significant meeting on July 4, 2025, focusing on the district's funding model and its implications for equity among schools. The discussions centered around a funding model that allocates more resources to schools based on the number of students enrolled in Advanced Placement (AP) classes, a system that has raised concerns regarding fairness and accessibility.

Commissioner Collins highlighted the complexities of the current funding model, noting that it disproportionately benefits schools with higher AP enrollment, such as Lowell High School, which receives $2.6 million, compared to smaller institutions like The Academy, which only receives $113,000. This disparity raises questions about the equitable distribution of funds, particularly for schools that do not offer AP courses but provide other valuable educational programs.

The meeting underscored the necessity of transparency in funding allocations. Several commissioners, including Collins and Assistant Superintendent Sanderson, emphasized the importance of making funding information accessible to the public, allowing for a clearer understanding of how resources are distributed on a per-student basis. This call for transparency aims to address the historical inequities that have persisted within the district's funding structure.

Superintendent Matthews acknowledged the challenges of the current model, advocating for a shift towards a more equitable approach that considers the needs of all students, not just those enrolled in AP classes. He pointed out that the funding model has been a longstanding issue, and any changes would require reopening negotiations with labor partners, complicating the process further.

As the meeting progressed, the board prepared to vote on two key items related to the funding model. Student Delegate Lam expressed concerns about the timing of the vote, suggesting that more public education on the implications of the funding changes was necessary before proceeding. Despite these concerns, the board ultimately voted in favor of the tentative agreement, with a majority supporting the continuation of the current funding model while acknowledging the need for future reforms.

The meeting concluded with a call for further discussions on how to address the inequities in the funding model, emphasizing the district's commitment to ensuring that all students have access to quality educational opportunities. The board's actions signal a recognition of the need for ongoing dialogue and reform to create a more equitable educational landscape in San Francisco.