A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Residents oppose two-story addition plan citing solar access and property concerns

May 05, 2021 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Residents oppose two-story addition plan citing solar access and property concerns
In a recent San Francisco city meeting, residents expressed significant concerns regarding a proposed two-story rear addition to a neighboring property. The discussion highlighted the potential negative impacts on solar access, outdoor usability, and property values for those living nearby.

Residents voiced their worries that the addition would extend 20 feet into their backyard, which is only 17 feet deep. They argued that this would block sunlight and limit their ability to enjoy their outdoor space. Despite previously negotiating a compromise with the project's architect, Andrew Bach, residents felt pressured into accepting terms that did not adequately address their concerns. They proposed a first-floor addition instead, which they believed would mitigate the adverse effects.

The residents also pointed out discrepancies in the submitted plans, claiming that the property lines were inaccurately represented. They referenced a Sanborn map to illustrate that their yard is significantly shorter than indicated in the plans, raising fears that the addition would encroach on their space and diminish their access to mid-block open areas.

The meeting underscored the importance of adhering to San Francisco's residential design guidelines, which emphasize the need for building expansions to be appropriate in height and depth relative to surrounding properties. Residents argued that the proposed addition would disrupt the neighborhood's character and leave them feeling "boxed in."

Additionally, tensions escalated as residents accused the permit holders of retaliatory tactics, including unfounded allegations of unpermitted work at their home. This situation has left them feeling uncomfortable and concerned about potential further conflicts with their neighbors.

As the city continues to navigate these complex residential issues, the outcome of this permit request will likely have lasting implications for community relations and the preservation of neighborhood integrity. The residents are determined to pursue their rights to voice concerns and seek a resolution that respects their living conditions and property rights.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee