Homeowners challenge Clay Hill HOA over East Wall window modifications

In a recent San Francisco city meeting, residents voiced their concerns over proposed changes to the East Wall of the Clay Hill condominium complex, a project that has been in the works since 2019. The meeting, held on July 4, 2025, highlighted the ongoing tension between homeowners and the Homeowners Association (HOA) regarding window replacements and structural repairs.

The discussion began with a presentation on the scope of the project, which includes replacing redwood siding, repairing damaged framing, and installing new windows. However, homeowners Julie and Julia raised alarms about significant alterations to window sizes that they claim were not communicated effectively. They argued that the architect's changes would reduce the size of their living room windows by 25% and alter the style of bathroom windows from awning to sliding, contrary to previous agreements.

The homeowners expressed frustration over a lack of transparency from the HOA and the architect, stating that their requests for meetings to discuss the plans were ignored. They had previously filed a jurisdiction request with the San Francisco Department of Building Inspection (DBI) due to concerns about the proposed changes, which they believed violated city codes that protect existing window sizes.

In response, Justin Zucker, representing the HOA, defended the project, stating that the repairs were necessary for the safety and integrity of the building. He emphasized that the HOA had the authority to make decisions regarding common areas and that the proposed changes were made in consultation with professional advisors. Zucker argued that the new windows would conform better to the overall aesthetic of the complex and address existing issues like water intrusion and dry rot.

The meeting also featured input from city officials, including members of the DBI, who confirmed that the permit for the project had been issued correctly and that any changes in window size would require compliance with fire safety regulations. The officials acknowledged the homeowners' concerns about privacy but noted that such matters typically fall outside the purview of the planning department.

As the meeting progressed, it became clear that the homeowners and the HOA remain at an impasse. The residents are seeking to maintain their current window sizes to ensure adequate natural light and privacy, while the HOA is focused on necessary repairs and compliance with building codes. The outcome of this dispute could set a precedent for how similar projects are handled in the future, highlighting the delicate balance between individual homeowner rights and the collective responsibilities of condominium associations.

With the East Wall project still in limbo, residents are left wondering how their voices will be heard in the ongoing negotiations, as they strive for a resolution that respects both their living conditions and the structural needs of their community.