Arkansas residents advocate for public access to University of Arkansas Pine Tree land

In a recent meeting of the Arkansas Senate Education Committee, significant discussions centered around the future of Pine Tree, a public land area crucial for hunting and fishing access. Advocates for keeping Pine Tree public presented compelling testimonies, emphasizing its importance for outdoor recreation, especially for those who may not have access to private land.

James Brandenburg, chair of the Arkansas chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, highlighted that over 2,100 citizens have signed a petition to maintain public access to Pine Tree. He pointed out that the land was originally designated for public use under the Bankhead Jones Farm Tenant Act, which prohibits its use for private industrial or commercial purposes. Brandenburg argued that the university, which currently owns the land, has not provided sufficient evidence to justify any sale that would restrict public access.

Stacy Schaeffer, a disabled veteran, shared her personal experiences using Pine Tree for educational purposes with her children, as well as for recreational activities. She underscored the land's unique accessibility for individuals with mobility impairments, making it a vital resource for many families.

Steve Brown and Tim Fisher, both local residents, echoed these sentiments, stressing the emotional and practical implications of losing access to Pine Tree. Brown recounted his long history of hunting in the area and the impact it has had on youth in the community. Fisher emphasized the need for public hunting grounds, particularly for low-income families who rely on such spaces.

The University of Arkansas has expressed opposition to the bill but did not send representatives to the meeting to voice their concerns. This absence raised questions about the university's commitment to engaging with community stakeholders regarding the future of Pine Tree.

The discussions at this meeting reflect broader concerns about public land use and access in Arkansas, particularly as urban development pressures mount. The committee's decision on this matter could have lasting implications for outdoor recreation and community engagement in the region. As the committee continues to gather public input, the future of Pine Tree remains uncertain, with advocates urging lawmakers to uphold the land's original public purpose.