Residents urge Dakota Pacific to adhere to original development plan for Kimball Junction

Summit County residents voiced strong concerns during the County Council meeting on March 8, 2023, regarding a proposed amendment by Dakota Pacific to develop a high-density housing project in Kimball Junction. The proposal includes 727 housing units, which many community members argue could exacerbate existing issues related to water usage, traffic congestion, and the overall quality of life in the area.

Several speakers highlighted the pressing water crisis in Summit County, emphasizing that adding more residential units would place additional strain on already limited resources. Jill Kennard, a resident of Pinebrook, expressed frustration over the environmental impact of the proposed development, advocating for the original commercial zoning of the property instead. She questioned Dakota Pacific's due diligence in exploring all options before seeking amendments to the development agreement.

Brendan Weinstein, a Prospector resident, echoed these sentiments, arguing that the amended proposal would lead to increased traffic and air quality issues, ultimately lowering the quality of life for current residents. He urged the council to reject the proposal and insisted that Dakota Pacific should adhere to the original plan.

Helen Nadel, a newcomer to Park City, emphasized the need for affordable housing but cautioned against the proposed density, which she believes does not adequately address the community's needs. She pointed out that many workers commute into the county, exacerbating traffic problems, and called for more affordable housing options that cater to local residents.

Deborah Lawler, a long-time resident, raised concerns about the potential impacts of the proposed housing units on local infrastructure, including schools and public services. She argued that the community would bear the financial burden of increased taxes and service demands while Dakota Pacific would reap the profits.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between community needs and developer interests, with many residents advocating for a return to the original development plan that prioritized commercial use over residential expansion. As the council deliberates on the proposal, the voices of concerned residents highlight the critical balance between development and preserving the quality of life in Summit County.