A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Board approves height variance for St. Moritz Terrace home while addressing tree removal concerns

March 28, 2024 | Summit County Board of Adjustment, Summit County Commission and Boards, Summit County, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board approves height variance for St. Moritz Terrace home while addressing tree removal concerns
In a recent meeting of the Summit County Board of Adjustment, board members deliberated on a height variance request for a proposed residential structure at 115 St. Moritz Terrace. The discussion highlighted community concerns regarding the potential removal of trees and the overall impact of the construction on the surrounding environment.

Board members expressed apprehension about the number of trees that might be lost during the building process. Although there was a desire to minimize tree removal, legal counsel clarified that the board does not have the authority to impose restrictions on tree removal as part of the variance approval. Instead, the board can only set conditions related to the height of the structure, which is the primary focus of the variance request.

The proposed design initially included a four-story home, but board members suggested reducing the height to three stories to better align with community standards and aesthetics. They requested further analysis of the building's height from various points on the property to assess its visual impact. Despite these discussions, the design remained largely unchanged due to the depth of the garage.

Ultimately, the board voted unanimously to approve the height variance, with specific conditions outlined in the staff report. These conditions included a maximum building height of 55 feet above existing grade, with a limitation that the height as viewed from the public right of way should not exceed 13 feet. The board also emphasized the importance of minimizing tree removal, although this was not a condition they could enforce.

The meeting concluded with a brief recess, allowing board members and attendees to regroup before continuing with the agenda. The decision reflects the board's commitment to balancing development needs with community concerns about environmental preservation and neighborhood aesthetics.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee