Variance request for shade structures sparks heated debate

In a recent government meeting, a proposal for variances related to a residential property was discussed, focusing on the construction of two shade structures. The property, located in the NT 2 zoning district, meets the minimum lot size requirements but seeks to reduce the required setbacks for the structures, which are intended to provide shade for a newly constructed pool.

The proposed shade structures, designed as cantilevered metal roofs supported by wood posts, would each cover approximately 144 square feet. The applicant, Grover Flack of Judkins Construction, emphasized the need for these structures to enhance usability and aesthetics, particularly during the hot summer months when the pool area becomes uncomfortable without shade. He noted that the client was unaware of the setback requirements when purchasing the property.

Despite the applicant's arguments, city staff recommended denial of the variance requests, citing that they did not meet the guiding criteria of the zoning code. Staff also noted that no objections were raised by nearby property owners or local neighborhood associations, which could indicate community support for the project.

During the meeting, alternative options for providing shade were discussed, including temporary structures like pop-up tents or retractable awnings, which do not require permits if they meet specific size criteria. However, these alternatives were deemed less aesthetically pleasing and not suitable for long-term use.

The discussion highlighted the challenges faced by homeowners in navigating zoning regulations while trying to enhance their properties. The meeting concluded without a decision, as further deliberation on the variance requests is expected.