In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the proposed installation of a new broadband tower in a residential area, which has sparked significant opposition from local residents. Concerns raised by neighbors include the aesthetics of the tower, potential health risks, impacts on property values, and noise from emergency generators.
Despite the opposition, the county's rural broadband manager expressed support for the tower, emphasizing the critical need for improved internet access in underserved areas. She highlighted that unequal access to broadband can hinder access to essential services such as telehealth, education, and employment opportunities, particularly as remote work becomes more prevalent. The county aims to enhance affordable high-speed internet access for these communities, with the proposed tower expected to provide faster and more cost-effective service compared to existing providers.
The zoning ordinance categorizes the tower as a \"disfavored facility\" due to its proximity to residential properties, although it is ranked as a preferred facility for new sites in previously served areas. A neighborhood map presented during the meeting illustrated the tower's visibility to nearby homes and the local school, raising further concerns among residents.
The applicant conducted outreach to 20 property owners within a quarter-mile radius, inviting them to a meeting where only nine attended. Since then, the county has received 19 additional comments, all opposing the project. The commission is tasked with weighing these community concerns against federal statutes that govern such applications, which may influence their decision on whether to approve or deny the tower's construction.