Salem Town Council Faces Controversy Over Mobile Home Tax Increases

The Salem Town Council convened on June 17, 2024, to address several key issues, including the approval of resolutions for infrastructure improvements, community engagement initiatives, and a contentious tax abatement request from local mobile home parks.

The meeting began with a moment of silence for George Corey, a former selectman, followed by the approval of the meeting minutes and the consent agenda, both passed unanimously. Councilor Claire Caribbean addressed the council, advocating for a reconsideration of policies regarding pre-purchased burial plots at Pine Grove Cemetery, which has recently expanded its capacity.

A significant resolution discussed was the allocation of $185,988.18 from traffic impact fees for repairs at Pine Grove Cemetery, which was unanimously approved. Additionally, the council adopted a set of goals for the 2024-2025 period, focusing on fiscal responsibility, operational efficiency, community engagement, infrastructure improvements, and environmental sustainability.

The council also reviewed two Lancaster Fund requests from local organizations. The Friends of Salem Recreation sought $2,500 for bleachers at Hedgehog Park, while the Friends of the Salem Bike Ped Corridor requested $25,100 for improvements to the rail trail area. Both requests were acknowledged for further consideration.

However, the most heated discussion arose over a tax abatement request from three mobile home parks, which faced significant valuation increases—up to 88%—following a partial assessment update. Attorney Bernard Campbell argued that the town's actions were improper and could lead to legal challenges, citing a Supreme Court ruling that restricts changes to property assessments between revaluations unless specific criteria are met. Glenn Gidley, representing the mobile home parks, expressed concerns about the financial burden on residents, many of whom are elderly and on fixed incomes.

Despite the arguments presented, the council ultimately voted to deny the abatement request, with a vote of 7-1, reflecting a belief in the assessor's authority to adjust valuations based on market data. The council emphasized the importance of maintaining equitable assessments across the community.

The meeting concluded with a commitment to revisit the issues raised and ensure that future assessments align with the town's established revaluation schedule.