Town's noise ordinance faces backlash over vague criteria

During a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding proposed revisions to the town's noise ordinance. Critics argue that the new language, which states it shall be unlawful to make \"disturbing or unnecessary sound or noise,\" is overly vague and subjective. One speaker emphasized that what may be considered disturbing to a police officer could differ greatly from individual perceptions, labeling the criteria as \"highly arbitrary\" and potentially indefensible in court.

The discussion highlighted the town's previous adoption of the state’s model noise ordinance in 2021, which was deemed more stringent than the current proposal. The speaker pointed out that the existing ordinance does not allow for effective enforcement, as defense attorneys can easily challenge its arbitrary nature. They warned that adopting the new ordinance would strip law enforcement of their ability to manage noise violations effectively, potentially leading to increased disturbances from both one-time and ongoing violators, such as commercial properties and bars.

In addition to noise control, the meeting also touched on the topic of cannabis dispensaries. A speaker noted that the council had previously established licenses for both medical and recreational dispensaries, but emphasized the need for action to fast-track the establishment of a recreational dispensary in Morris Town. They cautioned that delaying progress on cannabis could create a perception that the town is resistant to the economic benefits associated with it.

The meeting underscored the complexities of balancing community standards with enforcement capabilities, as well as the ongoing discussions surrounding cannabis regulation in the town.