Employees demand clarity on controversial job reclassifications

In a recent government meeting, employees from Kern County expressed concerns regarding a controversial reclassification process that has led to perceived voluntary demotions and confusion over salary structures. Employees reported that they were reclassified from administrative coordinator positions to senior HR specialists without prior consultation, raising issues about transparency and fairness in the process.

One employee highlighted that while their salary would remain unchanged, the reclassification could negatively impact future salary increases and career progression. This sentiment was echoed by others who felt that the lack of communication from management did not align with the county's stated values of treating employees with respect and fairness.

Michael Gallard, Assistant Chief Human Resources Officer, addressed these concerns, clarifying that no employee would see a reduction in their salary due to the reclassification. He emphasized that the salary ranges would remain static, and employees would continue to receive step increases until they reached the maximum of their current range. However, the ambiguity surrounding the long-term implications of these changes left some employees unsatisfied.

Further complicating the situation, Karen Bessard, a long-time county employee, raised issues regarding the representation of employees during the reclassification discussions, noting that union representatives were absent from key meetings. She urged for a review of the reclassification process, particularly for two child support administrative coordinators who felt they were not adequately represented.

The meeting also touched on procedural concerns, with Alicia Aleman requesting the temporary removal of an agenda item related to the reclassification, citing a lack of communication from the commission regarding decisions that could affect employees' job statuses.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the reclassification process has sparked significant concern among county employees, prompting calls for greater transparency and dialogue between management and staff to ensure fair treatment and adherence to established protocols.