Residents of District 19 voiced strong opposition during a recent city council meeting regarding the proposed conditional use approval for a high-density development at 6610 and 6706 Old Sauk Road. The project, spearheaded by Stonehouse Development, has raised significant concerns among local homeowners about its potential impact on public health, safety, and the overall character of the neighborhood.
Multiple speakers, including civil engineers and concerned residents, highlighted that the development does not meet several key standards outlined in city ordinance 28.183. They argued that the project would exacerbate existing stormwater issues, potentially leading to flooding in surrounding properties. Gary Foster, a civil engineer, emphasized the inadequacy of the current stormwater management plan, noting that it fails to address the known flooding problems in the area. He questioned the urgency with which the plan commission and city council are moving forward with the approval, suggesting that delaying the decision could compel the developer to address necessary corrections.
Barb Foster, another resident, expressed frustration over what she perceives as a top-down approach to governance, where community concerns are overlooked in favor of developer interests. She argued that the proposed three-story apartment building is incompatible with the single-family residential character of the neighborhood, which has a strong community-oriented atmosphere.
Anne McGidwin raised specific concerns about the stormwater discharge from the development, stating that the proposed plan could lead to increased runoff and damage to neighboring properties. She called for a thorough review of the stormwater management strategies before any approval is granted.
The sentiment among residents was clear: they believe the proposed development is too large for the site and does not align with the city’s comprehensive plan for low and medium residential development. Many speakers urged the council to reconsider the approval, emphasizing the need for a more thoughtful and inclusive planning process that genuinely considers the voices of local residents.
As the council deliberates, the outcome of this appeal could set a significant precedent for future developments in the area, particularly regarding how community input is integrated into urban planning decisions.