Controversial window replacement request sparks design debate

In a recent government meeting, a request for a certificate of appropriateness was discussed regarding modifications to a dual house property, specifically focusing on the replacement of windows in the rear structure. The applicant submitted a proposal to replace the existing windows with new vinyl options, citing that the current windows are in poor condition and irreparable due to damage sustained during a storm in 2008.

The staff report highlighted that eight notices were sent out regarding the application, with no responses received. However, the staff expressed concerns about the proposal's compliance with established design standards, which prioritize the repair of original windows over replacement. When replacement is necessary, the standards dictate that new windows should match the design and materials of the original ones. The existing windows on the property feature a mix of styles, including 6 over 6, 2 over 2, and 1 over 1 configurations, predominantly made of wood.

Staff concluded that the proposed vinyl windows do not conform to these design standards, as they do not match the existing window styles or materials. Consequently, they recommended that the request be denied. Nonetheless, they noted that if the Landmark Commission finds the proposal compliant, specific conditions could be applied.

During the public hearing, the property owner defended the request, explaining the severe condition of the current windows, which are reportedly held together with caulk and are at risk of further deterioration. The owner emphasized the choice of high-grade, impact-resistant vinyl windows as a necessary solution to ensure the structural integrity of the property.

The meeting concluded without any immediate decisions, leaving the fate of the window replacement request pending further review by the Landmark Commission.