During a recent government meeting, residents voiced strong concerns regarding the state of local road repairs and the existing special assessment system used to fund them. One resident emphasized the need for future road repairs to be guided by objective ratings, specifically referencing the PASER ratings, which assess road conditions. They criticized the current state of Penfield and Dunham streets, both rated as the worst possible, and called for repairs to be prioritized based on these ratings rather than community influence.
Another resident, Rick Bridal, raised issues with the special assessment system, which has been a source of frustration among community members. He questioned the feasibility of a proposed ballot measure for increased millage to fund road repairs while the special assessment system remains in place. Bridal suggested that the village should eliminate this system entirely, arguing that it has been unpopular since its inception in 1975 and has led to widespread dissatisfaction among residents.
John Tomaszewski, a long-time resident, also expressed his love for the village but did not elaborate on specific concerns. The discussions highlighted a growing demand for transparency and accountability in how road maintenance is funded and executed, with residents advocating for a more systematic and fair approach to infrastructure improvements.