Council debates airport funding amid privatization calls

During a recent city council meeting, members engaged in a heated discussion regarding the future of the local airport and its funding. The council voted to waive a midnight curfew to continue deliberations, ultimately passing a motion to extend the meeting hours.

A significant point of contention arose around the airport's financial viability. Councilor Giesta proposed privatizing the airport, arguing that the city has been investing money without seeing substantial returns. He emphasized the need for a change in management to improve operations. In contrast, Councilor Lopes defended the airport, highlighting that despite its outdated facilities, it still generates over $1 million for the city's general fund, even while running at a deficit.

The council debated several budget items related to the airport, with multiple proposals failing to pass. Notably, a motion to add staff at the airport was rejected, with Councilor Ferrer suggesting that staffing decisions should wait until a new terminal is constructed. The council also discussed the potential for housing development on airport land if financial contributions from the city continue.

Ultimately, the council's discussions reflected a broader concern about the airport's future and its impact on the city's finances. The meeting concluded with several budget items failing to pass, indicating a lack of consensus on how to proceed with the airport's management and funding.