Historic Board Rejects Controversial Pergola Design Proposal

In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the proposed construction of pergolas at the Bishop Diocese of St. Augustine's property, located at 35 Treasury Street. The application, identified as HP 2024 0039, seeks to install two pergolas with retractable covers in the courtyard between the rectory and the cathedral basilica. However, the proposal has raised concerns regarding its design and materials, which some board members believe do not align with the historic character of the area.

The meeting began with a presentation from a representative of the architectural firm involved, who explained that the pergolas would be made of fiberglass, a choice made for its durability against the local climate. The representative emphasized that the design aimed to distinguish the new structures from the existing building while maintaining functionality for parishioners.

However, the board's staff report highlighted that the proposed materials and design were inconsistent with the Mediterranean Revival style of the building, which was constructed in 1965. Staff recommended that the board defer the application to allow the applicant time to consider a more appropriate design and materials that align with the guidelines of the Historic Architectural Review Board (HARP).

Public comments during the meeting reflected a mix of opinions. Some community members supported the staff's recommendation, arguing that the use of fiberglass and the overall design did not fit the historic context of the district. Others, including a long-time parishioner, defended the need for durable materials that would require less maintenance and blend into the existing landscape.

Board members expressed a consensus that the proposed pergolas lacked compatibility with the surrounding architecture. Suggestions included exploring wooden designs that could better reflect the historical context or incorporating masonry elements to enhance the aesthetic appeal.

Ultimately, the board agreed that the current proposal was not suitable and encouraged the applicants to revisit their design, aiming for a solution that respects the historic integrity of the site while meeting the functional needs of the church community. The application will be revisited once the applicants have made the necessary adjustments.