A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Community divided over controversial hookah lounge reopening

June 18, 2024 | Buffalo City, Erie County, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Community divided over controversial hookah lounge reopening
During a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a proposed special use permit for a hookah lounge and convenience store in Buffalo, which has faced significant community opposition due to past incidents involving firearms. Attorney Matt Lazro, representing the applicant Kovan Delio, outlined the establishment's current operations and the changes made to address city concerns. The convenience store is already operational, while the hookah lounge seeks to reopen after a previous license revocation linked to violent incidents.

Community members voiced strong objections, citing a history of violence associated with the previous hookah lounge operations. Thomas Lombardo, an operator of a nearby business, questioned the applicant's ability to foster a safe environment, arguing that the establishment has not demonstrated a commitment to attracting law-abiding patrons. Donna Lombardo echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the negative impact on the neighborhood and calling for legislation to protect communities from absentee landlords.

In response to safety concerns, architect John Leiden proposed a keyed access system to prevent minors from moving between the convenience store and the hookah lounge. Kovan Delio, the owner, acknowledged past incidents but asserted that he has maintained a generally safe operation over his 11 years in business. He committed to hiring additional security to enhance safety measures.

The council members expressed the need for further discussions before making a decision, highlighting the importance of addressing community concerns adequately. The public hearing was subsequently closed, with plans for continued dialogue on the matter.

In addition, the meeting included discussions on two applications for non-owner occupied short-term rental permits, with concerns raised about the legitimacy of operations and compliance with local regulations. Both applications were tabled for further review, reflecting the council's cautious approach to managing neighborhood impacts from such businesses.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee