Controversial expansion plan sparks neighborhood debate

In a recent government meeting, a proposal for a significant rear addition to an existing nonconforming structure was discussed, drawing both support and concern from community members. The project, which involves a three-story wood frame construction, aims to expand the living space of the property located on a 5,250 square foot lot. The proposed addition will include a ground-level parking area and two additional living floors, resulting in a total gross square footage of 3,290.

The existing basement will be infilled to comply with floodplain regulations, raising the living space above the floodplain elevation. The new design will feature a relocated kitchen, an open office, and a full bathroom on the first floor, while the second floor will accommodate a master bedroom and a secondary bedroom, bringing the total to four bedrooms and three bathrooms.

The applicant is seeking a finding for a horizontal extension of the existing structure, which currently has a six-foot setback. The new addition will push this setback back to seven feet, remaining within the bounds of existing nonconformity. Additionally, a variance for excessive Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is being requested, as the project exceeds the 40% limit set for multifamily zones.

Concerns were raised by local residents regarding the impact of the proposed expansion on the neighborhood's character and the potential for increased flooding risks. One resident, Jim Edwards, expressed worries about the building's proximity to neighboring properties and the overall architectural integrity of the area, suggesting that the new structure could overpower adjacent homes.

The engineering department highlighted the need for further specifications regarding impervious area increases and utility layouts, emphasizing that any development must comply with flood zone regulations. The proposal is set to undergo further review by the conservation commission, with community members eager to see how the project will align with local zoning laws and environmental considerations.

As discussions continue, the outcome of this proposal remains uncertain, with stakeholders closely monitoring its implications for the neighborhood's future.