City of Atascadero moves forward with controversial development agreement

In a recent meeting, the Atascadero Planning Commission discussed a unique development agreement between the city and property owner Scott Newton, aimed at facilitating future residential development on a 4-acre site located on Viejo Camino and El Camino Real. This agreement, which is part of a settlement from previous litigation regarding denied applications for a mini-storage facility, outlines the potential for up to 42 residential units, although no specific development plans have been submitted yet.

The properties currently hold a general plan designation of public and a zoning district of public. To proceed with residential development, a general plan amendment is necessary, which is anticipated to align with the city's ongoing citywide general plan update. The commission noted that if the site is not designated for residential use in the updated plan, any future developer would need to seek an amendment to allow for such use.

Key components of the development agreement include provisions for creek realignment, which aims to enhance the developable area while adhering to various state, federal, and local regulations. The agreement also specifies traffic access points, requiring primary access to Viejo Camino and the installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements along that frontage.

The commission emphasized that the development agreement does not supersede local codes but rather defines the requirements for future residential development. It is designed to streamline the approval process, allowing future developments that comply with the agreement to bypass additional environmental reviews.

The agreement is set to last for ten years, during which time the property will revert to its original zoning and general plan designation if development does not occur. The commission is recommending that the city council approve the draft development agreement, which aims to provide clarity and certainty for both the city and the property owner regarding future development expectations. Public comments during the meeting indicated a community interest in the implications of this agreement, particularly in light of past disputes over the property’s use.