Legalizing Controversial Patio Sparks Community Debate

In a recent government meeting, the application for a patio and retaining wall at 40 Dunnedale Road was approved, despite initial concerns regarding permitting and impervious coverage. Homeowners Rajneesh Tawari and Wanna Shukla sought to legalize a 650-square-foot patio, a 35-inch high retaining wall, and a set of stairs after beginning construction without a permit, believing it was unnecessary based on prior contractor advice.

The couple explained that they purchased the property last year and intended to create a family-friendly outdoor space. They halted construction upon learning of the permit requirement and promptly applied for approval. During the meeting, they presented photographs of the completed patio, which features a sand-based installation designed to allow water drainage.

Concerns were raised about the potential for increased impervious coverage affecting neighboring properties. However, the homeowners assured the board that their property is situated on a slope, minimizing any water runoff issues. They also communicated with neighbors, receiving no objections to their project.

The board ultimately voted unanimously in favor of granting a variance to legalize the patio and retaining wall, allowing the homeowners to enjoy their outdoor space legally. The approval is contingent upon obtaining a zoning permit, which the homeowners were informed they could pursue following the meeting.

In a separate application, Mary Jean Wallace sought to replace her driveway and retaining wall at 46 Berlin Road. She explained that the existing driveway was damaged due to tree roots and that the project would improve accessibility for her vehicle and ease snow removal, particularly given her health concerns. Wallace confirmed that the project would not require an expanded curb cut, thus avoiding additional variances.

Both applications reflect ongoing efforts by residents to enhance their properties while navigating local zoning regulations.