A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Malloy Says Maps Were Drawn Without Public Input; Udell Backs Referendum

October 03, 2026 | Utah Debate Commission, Utah Citizen Journalism, Elections, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Malloy Says Maps Were Drawn Without Public Input; Udell Backs Referendum
Redistricting proved a sharply contested topic in the Utah Tech University debate. Moderator Bob Evans asked whether the new boundaries for the 3rd Congressional District were "fair, equitable, and competitive."

Celeste Malloy said the drafting process lacked public input and criticized the way the maps were selected: "the process of drawing these maps didn't include public comment," she said, adding that she had joined a lawsuit with elected officials to try to restore the process spelled out in law. Kent Udell countered that the maps resulted from a legal referendum and reflected what "the people wanted." He said representatives must aim to represent the whole district when different communities have conflicting interests.

The candidates offered competing remedies: Malloy emphasized judicial and legislative avenues to alter mapmaking procedure; Udell argued the referendum outcome should stand. The debate did not resolve the legal issues and no new legislative action was announced by either campaign.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee