Staff proposes dropping unnecessary second readings where state law permits

Mary Bunting told council staff had identified a number of routine ordinance items currently undergoing two readings even though state law does not require it, and suggested council could enact such items on first reading where appropriate. "We are proposing that we eliminate 2nd reading requirements on all items where 2nd readings are not required," Bunting said, adding that financial matters, budgets and appropriations would still require the two readings state law mandates.

Council members said they valued the flexibility that a second reading provides — the ability to defer or reverse a vote — and staff noted that an item could be deferred rather than retained for a second reading if council members needed more time. Staff offered to prepare the legal code amendments needed to implement any change members supported.