A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commission weighs sales-tax referendum, property-tax options and modest utility increases

September 30, 2026 | Devils Lake, Ramsey County, North Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission weighs sales-tax referendum, property-tax options and modest utility increases
Rob presented revenue alternatives that would offset growing public-safety costs: re-running a sales-tax referendum with a clearly defined use of proceeds, pursuing a property-tax cap increase at a general election, increasing utility rates modestly, or using reserves as a stopgap. "You could go back after a sales tax referendum," Rob said, noting the last attempt failed and stressing the importance of clearly defining where revenue would be spent if the measure were to pass.

Commissioners debated what defined relief or offsets would make a ballot measure acceptable to voters, discussed a range (0.25 to 0.5 cents) as examples, and noted timing constraints that make a 2028 general-election measure most feasible. Staff will model revenue scenarios and present specific ballot language options if the commission directs that path.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee