Caller alleges Brown Act violations over revised agendas; clerk points to posted 'revised' notice

During the virtual public-comment period, caller Daniel Guss (identified in the record as Daniel Guss) alleged the council had committed multiple Brown Act violations related to revised agendas, saying English-language subscribers were not told agendas were revised while Spanish-language recipients had received a 'revised' label.

"You're gonna get a Brown Act violation," Guss said repeatedly, alleging that each item (items 2–7) had been published as revised only on the Spanish-language agenda and not on the English-language notices. The clerk responded that the clerk's office reviewed the website and that the agendas page shows a bold 'revised special agenda' notice and that item 7 was listed with the revision asterisk. The clerk urged callers to consult the posted agendas and explained avenues for accessing agenda copies.

The allegation raised a procedural question the council did not resolve on the dais at that time; the clerk's immediate response indicated the posting was visible on the clerk's website but did not address the caller's claim about differential notice to English-language subscribers.