Rashad Moore, presenting on behalf of county roads and public works, told the court that “with public works, coming back together, development services is what I think the county needs to focus on.” He walked commissioners through an organizational chart that would group road and bridge, fleet maintenance, parks, traffic and permitting under a consolidated Public Works department and offered two staffing options: an Assistant Director for Development Services (engineer preferred) or a Development Services Manager with land-development experience.
Moore said the assistant-director option targets an engineer with “5 to 7 years of experience” and that a separate Floodplain and Right-of-Way Administrator role would manage permitting, inspections and floodplain applications. He described the changes as largely a retitling and reclassification of existing budgeted roles rather than adding headcount.
Commissioners questioned whether the county should require a Professional Engineer and debated pay bands and recruitment strategy. One commissioner said combining the job descriptions would “pull from a wider range of candidates” and another called option 2 (development manager) “more realistic” to fill locally. The court settled on directing staff to draft a combined job description and bring reclassification and titles back to the commissioners for formal action.
The discussion emphasized practical goals: reduce permitting delays, improve coordination on subdivision acceptance, and create a single point of responsibility for right-of-way enforcement and floodplain administration. Moore noted training and certification requirements for the right-of-way/floodplain role, including floodplain-management certification and a TxDOT LGP-101 project-management credential.