During the Sept. 21 budget workshop, commissioners and staff debated the county's cash‑reserve target and whether to reduce it to reallocate funds. County staff presented budget scenarios showing that lowering the reserve from 2% to 1.5% would free roughly $99,000–$109,000 for redistribution; keeping the reserve at 2% would leave less immediately available for allocations such as library support or juvenile detention overspends.
One commissioner summarized the practical trade‑off: "Full disclosure, I was the commissioner that thought we would still be able to fund the library 3 weeks ago," and said revised mill valuations and reworked department numbers forced difficult choices. A second commissioner argued for maintaining a 2% reserve to protect against surprises like juvenile detention or state‑hospital bills. Because two commissioners supported 2% and one favored 1.5%, staff recommended a noticed meeting later in the week for an official vote so the county can meet public‑notice requirements for the preliminary budget.
Staff also identified potential one‑time or revenue options — including adding Microsoft 365 licensing and a $40,000 placeholder for state‑hospital bills — and reminded commissioners that the county faces a transition in finance staff after their previous finance officer departed in May. The commissioners agreed not to take a final vote in the workshop and to schedule a formal session to set reserve levels and publish the preliminary budget.