A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Panel explores remedy if stop found unlawful; bench signals remand likely

September 22, 2026 | Other Court, Judicial , Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Panel explores remedy if stop found unlawful; bench signals remand likely
A judge asked whether, if the court agreed the initial encounter was a Terry stop, the appellate remedy would be to suppress evidence "and then send it back" to the trial court to determine what remained admissible. Both sides acknowledged that many factual details bearing on attenuation and admissibility were not fully developed in the trial-court hearing.

The State repeatedly urged remand so the trial court could address attenuation and mixed-motive issues in the record; defense counsel said she expected the State to argue some items could still be admissible but continued to press that the lack of attenuation warranted suppression.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee