Board members and staff discussed whether unique elements of the Red House—particularly an arched window that was later installed by a prior owner—must be reinstalled in the exact original place or could be repurposed within the development. Staff emphasized practical constraints including hazardous materials and the need for double‑glazing in new construction, and the applicant said reusing some elements could be difficult and costly.
The board resolved those tensions by attaching conditions to the demolition approval that require the applicant to attempt to salvage foundation stone walls, the chimney stone, windows and interior siding in serviceable condition, and the arched window for interior reuse or placement elsewhere on the site. "We will use our best effort to try to do those things," developer Matt Davis told the board when asked about reuse commitments. The board and staff agreed that if materials prove unsalvageable during removal, the applicant should document that outcome and return to the board with updated recommendations.