A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Appellate panel hears claim McPhillips was denied right to represent himself

September 23, 2026 | Other Court, Judicial , Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Appellate panel hears claim McPhillips was denied right to represent himself
Esther Garcia, counsel with the Washington Appellate Project representing Thomas McPhillips, told the appellate panel that the state and federal constitutions guarantee a defendant's right to self-representation and that the trial court should have conducted the required two-part inquiry. "The state and federal constitutions guarantee the right to self representation," Garcia said, arguing the court must first resolve whether the request was timely and unequivocal and then whether it was voluntary, knowing and intelligent.

Garcia urged the court to view McPhillips's statements in the context of the whole record, including earlier hearings and a compressed schedule after an Oct. 31 arrest and arraignment. She pointed to multiple moments where McPhillips told the court he had prepared jury questions and had "represented myself before and I am ready to move forward now," arguing those statements showed readiness. Garcia asked the panel to reverse, saying the trial court effectively ignored his requests and failed to apply the proper inquiry.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee