Committee members spent substantial time debating penalty structures and how citations would be applied in the field. Staff said the municipal-code text is currently scattered in adopted fire-code amendments and recommended consolidating it so officers and park rangers can find and cite a specific municipal-code section. "Safe and sane fireworks are not allowed here," Adam told the committee when explaining local practice and why clearer code language would help enforcement.
Members discussed graduated fine structures used by other cities. Staff cited examples and told the committee that "In other cities, I think it was 500, 1,000, and 1,500 were those 3 levels." Some members cautioned that higher fines could be politically sensitive in neighborhoods that contribute campaign support; others said meaningful penalties are needed to deter repeated violations. The committee asked staff to research call-for-service data and reporting-district breakdowns so councilmembers can assess local impacts before a final penalty recommendation.
The article avoids repeating an unclear numeric transcription that appeared in the record and instead relies on the clear example staff gave about graduated penalty levels elsewhere. The committee asked staff to return with data on historical calls for service and enforcement actions to support any recommended penalty schedule.