Kelso selects roadway segment for Tallyway Corridor; bridge remains high cost and higher risk
September 18, 2026 | Board Council Commission Agencies , Executive, Washington
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Craig, speaking for the City of Kelso, briefed the board on the Tallyway Corridor segment analysis and said the city selected Segment A (roadway) for immediate design and funding pursuit. "We've selected segment A, which is the roadway section," he told members and described the project phases from alternatives analysis into 30% design and permitting.
Craig said the bridge segment (B) carries higher environmental and permitting risk and may need to be combined with the intersection work in Segment C as a single larger project; the city will use the 74‑page segment analysis as a roadmap for funding and permitting and intends to move quickly into alternatives work to refine alignments and cost estimates.
Craig said the bridge segment (B) carries higher environmental and permitting risk and may need to be combined with the intersection work in Segment C as a single larger project; the city will use the 74‑page segment analysis as a roadmap for funding and permitting and intends to move quickly into alternatives work to refine alignments and cost estimates.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
