A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Appellant tells court the guarantee is a 'stand‑alone' contract limiting Paul's liability

September 18, 2026 | Other Court, Judicial , Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Appellant tells court the guarantee is a 'stand‑alone' contract limiting Paul's liability
James Ware, counsel for appellant Anthony Paul, told the panel the heart of the dispute is textual: "The guarantee of lease is a stand alone agreement," he said, arguing the guarantee contains the necessary definitions of "tenant" and "lease" and therefore controls the scope of Paul's liability.

Ware warned that excising the preamble definitions would render paragraph 16 and other provisions ambiguous and that inserting extrinsic conditional language would improperly transform an unambiguous contract. He told the bench that if the guarantee is unambiguous, its interpretation is a matter of law and summary judgment was appropriate rather than remand for further factual development.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee