A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Respondent tells court key exhibits were not admitted and denies state action

September 17, 2026 | Other Court, Judicial , Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Respondent tells court key exhibits were not admitted and denies state action
Gary Trabulsi, counsel for respondent Michael Pippkorn, told the panel the Jaws relied heavily on materials that were not admitted at trial and therefore should not be credited on appeal. ‘‘They submitted a map... That map was never introduced into evidence,’’ Trabulsi said, and he argued the map the appellants used to claim Ashton entered the Jaws’ property was not the map Pippkorn gave Ashton.

Trabulsi also described Ashton as an off‑duty officer hired through a private company and placed to oversee surveyors working on a disputed boundary; he argued the conduct did not meet the tight tests for state action and that the Fourth Amendment/§1983 claims therefore fail.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee