In a memorandum introduced the night before the Sept. 17 meeting, city staff proposed a set of late amendments that restored funding to several programs and added targeted capital investments.
Staff told the council those late amendments added about $4.6 million in revenue across two years (roughly $2.2 million annually) by adjusting fees and restoring funds previously proposed for reduction. Restorations included nutrition center funding, employee tuition reimbursement, scholarship collaborations to support roughly 2,900 students, cultural‑preservation staff support and a climate adaptation manager, along with a temporary one‑year gastronomy program restoration.
Capital amendments included a $1 million commitment ($500,000 per year) to women’s health programming and an $8 million increase in district capital improvements, described by staff as reallocations from reserves and targeted capital additions.
Councilmembers who supported the budget highlighted those restorations as reasons to approve the overall package: they argued the amendments protected services for vulnerable residents while allowing the city to address a structural shortfall. Members urging caution said the long‑term recurring costs should be reviewed carefully.